AOTS vs. GGTL
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AOTS is passively managed, while GGTL is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGTL.
Performance
AOTS vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly lower than GGTL's 24.82% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGTL
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 24.82%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- 1Y
- 41.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOTS vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -15.55% | -0.83% |
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 24.82% | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and GGTL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GGTL
AOTS vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOTS | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum GGTL drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and GGTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -23.65% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.68% | -3.88% | -12.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -7.39% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 19.47% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.19% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.19% | +1.48% |
AOTS vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 0.83% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and GGTL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AOTS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOTS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.
GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
They also come from different issuers: AOT and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.90% for GGTL.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and GGTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer