AOTS vs. FTEC
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
AOTS vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 31.89% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
AOTS vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -6.44% | -0.83% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 31.89% | -1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and FTEC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
FTEC
AOTS vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.82 | 0.99 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -34.95% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -1.49% | -6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -5.56% | -4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 20.63% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 25.23% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 24.69% | -5.32% |
AOTS vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and FTEC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.
FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.08% for FTEC.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer