PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOTG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AOTG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AOTG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
-14.12%25.26%32.20%54.58%-11.53%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-4.76%20.77%25.58%54.86%-5.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a -14.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -4.76% return.


AOTG

1D
0.89%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
-14.12%
6M
-11.94%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
-4.76%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
18.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AOTG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AOTG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG
AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOTGQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

1.07

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

1.66

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.00

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.03

7.32

-4.30

AOTG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOTGQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

1.07

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.38

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and QQQ is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AOTG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AOTGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-82.97%

+51.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.85%

-12.62%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.68%

-7.86%

-10.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-32.99%

+24.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

3.44%

+4.02%

Volatility

AOTG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.61%. This indicates that AOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AOTGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

6.61%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

12.82%

+6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.09%

22.70%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.40%

22.38%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.40%

22.25%

+7.15%