AOTG vs. ASMH
AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AOTG is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Over the past year, AOTG returned 39.35% vs 136.27% for ASMH. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
AOTG vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 66.70% return.
AOTG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 39.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMH
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 22.58%
- YTD
- 66.70%
- 6M
- 59.76%
- 1Y
- 136.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOTG vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 16.15% | 44.72% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 66.70% | 58.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTG and ASMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AOTG and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTG vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
AOTG
ASMH
AOTG vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 8.63 | -6.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | 22.27 | -17.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 3.52 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 3.67 | -2.71 |
Drawdowns
AOTG vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and ASMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -15.89% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.85% | -15.89% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | 0.00% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -4.31% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 6.14% | +1.79% |
Volatility
AOTG vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) is 7.56%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that AOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 13.56% | -6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 30.42% | -11.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 38.96% | -15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 38.27% | -9.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 38.27% | -9.01% |
AOTG vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTG vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 0.98% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTG and ASMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASMH has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to AOTG (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs ASMH's -15.89%.
On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 136.27% vs 39.35% for AOTG. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AOTG has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 136.27% return vs 39.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.
ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.
They also come from different issuers: AOT and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.19% for ASMH.
ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOTG and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer