AOS vs. PSLV
AOS (A. O. Smith Corporation) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, AOS returned 5.11%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AOS vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AOS has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of 5.11%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.
AOS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -14.27%
- 6M
- -14.83%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- -4.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.99%
- 10Y*
- 5.11%
PSLV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 100.09%
- 3Y*
- 41.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
AOS vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | -14.27% | 0.07% | -15.92% | 47.30% | -32.07% | 59.28% | 17.46% | 13.65% | -29.35% | 30.78% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -1.78% | 145.08% | 19.43% | -1.94% | 2.74% | -14.13% | 42.81% | 16.99% | -11.83% | 4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOS and PSLV is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
AOS:
$7.89B
PSLV:
$14.73B
AOS:
$3.75
PSLV:
$13.57
AOS:
15.13
PSLV:
1.71
AOS:
0.62
PSLV:
0.00
AOS:
2.09
PSLV:
218.98
AOS:
3.66
PSLV:
0.90
AOS:
$3.81B
PSLV:
$64.19M
AOS:
$1.48B
PSLV:
$404.67M
AOS:
$794.70M
PSLV:
$8.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOS vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank
AOS
PSLV
AOS vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOS | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.48 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 5.50 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOS | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 1.72 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.52 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.45 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.17 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and PSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOS | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -79.38% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.29% | -40.65% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.93% | -40.65% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.68% | -40.65% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.81% | -42.79% | -4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.86% | -36.11% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.47% | -58.15% | +37.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 18.25% | -5.95% |
Volatility
AOS vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is 7.88%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that AOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOS | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 16.57% | -8.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.90% | 57.35% | -38.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.73% | 58.49% | -33.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 35.64% | -8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 31.14% | -4.08% |
Dividends
AOS vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 2.50% | 2.06% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOS and PSLV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to AOS (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOS dropped -66.07% vs PSLV's -79.38%.
PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOS and PSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer