AOS vs. CTRA
Compare and contrast key facts about A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOS or CTRA.
Correlation
The correlation between AOS and CTRA is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AOS vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOS:
-0.54
CTRA:
-0.13
AOS:
-0.59
CTRA:
-0.03
AOS:
0.92
CTRA:
1.00
AOS:
-0.52
CTRA:
-0.10
AOS:
-1.26
CTRA:
-0.32
AOS:
10.25%
CTRA:
9.54%
AOS:
23.82%
CTRA:
23.17%
AOS:
-66.52%
CTRA:
-74.41%
AOS:
-24.67%
CTRA:
-25.69%
Fundamentals
AOS:
$10.27B
CTRA:
$18.06B
AOS:
$3.79
CTRA:
$1.65
AOS:
18.68
CTRA:
14.86
AOS:
2.00
CTRA:
44.67
AOS:
$3.89B
CTRA:
$5.45B
AOS:
$1.49B
CTRA:
$1.80B
AOS:
$818.50M
CTRA:
$3.52B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a -15.30% return, which is significantly lower than CTRA's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AOS has outperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 11.18%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.31% annualized return.
AOS
-15.30%
-4.22%
-17.65%
-14.38%
9.77%
11.18%
CTRA
-4.15%
-11.74%
-9.52%
-4.97%
11.76%
0.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOS vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOS vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than CTRA's 3.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 1.89% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 0.85% |
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 3.55% | 4.58% | 10.13% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 1.12% | 0.59% | 0.34% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, smaller than the maximum CTRA drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOS vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is 5.99%, while Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that AOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AOS vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A. O. Smith Corporation and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities