AOR vs. YCS
AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - AOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AOR returned 8.46%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for YCS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOR charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
AOR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 8.46%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.
AOR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 23.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
AOR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 7.96% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 6.99% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and YCS is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.07 |
The correlation between AOR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
YCS
AOR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 2.05 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 2.59 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.95 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 12.35 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.05 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.10 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.33 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -49.56% | +25.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -8.30% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -23.05% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -27.32% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -27.32% | +4.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -19.94% | +16.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 2.66% | -1.14% |
Volatility
AOR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 2.75% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.81% | 12.36% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 17.38% | -8.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 21.11% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.67% | 19.02% | -8.35% |
AOR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOR and YCS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to AOR (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.32% vs 8.46% for AOR. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
AOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 1.00% for YCS.
AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOR and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer