PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. VTWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOR vs. VTWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than VTWAX's 10.38% return.


AOR

1D
0.26%
1M
1.45%
YTD
6.83%
6M
7.42%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
8.52%

VTWAX

1D
2.34%
1M
1.21%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.15%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. VTWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
6.83%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%12.95%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
10.38%22.43%16.43%21.85%-18.02%18.17%16.67%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and VTWAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.96

The correlation between AOR and VTWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. VTWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWAX
VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. VTWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AORVTWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.66

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

11.61

-0.51

AOR vs. VTWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VTWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and VTWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOR vs. VTWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum VTWAX drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and VTWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORVTWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-34.20%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-9.64%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-16.43%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-26.40%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.45%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-5.29%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.21%

-0.66%

Volatility

AOR vs. VTWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) is 3.50%, while Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that AOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORVTWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

5.19%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

10.71%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.85%

13.07%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

15.82%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

18.23%

-7.53%

AOR vs. VTWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWAX's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOR vs. VTWAX - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than VTWAX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
2.48%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.59%1.80%1.92%2.06%2.17%1.79%1.64%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, AOR and VTWAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWAX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to AOR (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs VTWAX's -34.20%.

VTWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOR and VTWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer