AOR vs. RAAX
AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. AOR is passively managed, while RAAX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AOR returned 7.20%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for RAAX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RAAX.
Performance
AOR vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than RAAX's 18.69% return.
AOR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
RAAX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 19.93%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.60%
- 10Y*
- —
AOR vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 7.96% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.62% |
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 18.69% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 6.14% | -2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and RAAX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AOR and RAAX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AOR vs. RAAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOR
RAAX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AOR
RAAX
Financial Services
AOR
RAAX
Industrials
AOR
RAAX
Consumer Cyclical
AOR
RAAX
Communication Services
AOR
RAAX
Healthcare
AOR
RAAX
Consumer Defensive
AOR
RAAX
Energy
AOR
RAAX
Basic Materials
AOR
RAAX
Utilities
AOR
RAAX
Real Estate
AOR
RAAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
RAAX
AOR vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOR | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 2.76 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 3.58 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 5.87 | -2.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 22.06 | -8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOR | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.76 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.88 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.61 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum RAAX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and RAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -33.91% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -6.62% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -11.59% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -23.55% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.90% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -6.78% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.76% | -0.24% |
Volatility
AOR vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) is 2.70%, while VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that AOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 2.92% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.81% | 11.58% | -4.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 13.63% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 15.60% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.67% | 15.76% | -5.09% |
AOR vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOR vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than RAAX's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.97% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOR and RAAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RAAX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to AOR (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs RAAX's -33.91%.
On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.60% vs 7.20% for AOR. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.97% for RAAX.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 0.78% for RAAX.
RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOR and RAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer