AOR vs. MFUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. AOR is passively managed, while MFUL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AOR returned 14.41%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for MFUL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOR charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

AOR vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.57% return.

AOR

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: 8.46%

MFUL

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 7.53%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF	7.96%	16.44%	10.68%	15.75%	-15.64%	0.26%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.57%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	-12.46%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and MFUL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.71

Over the past year, AOR and MFUL have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.71, meaning their price movements have been converging.

AOR vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOR	MFUL
Technology	27.8%	25.8%
Financial Services	16.2%	10.7%
Industrials	11.9%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	8.7%
Communication Services	8.1%	8.4%
Healthcare	8.0%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	6.7%
Energy	4.3%	8.0%
Basic Materials	4.2%	5.5%
Utilities	2.7%	5.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	2.4%

Return for Risk

AOR vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR

AOR Risk / Return Rank: 71
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 54
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOR	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.93	+0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.74	+0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.38	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.27	+0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.48	8.78	+4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOR vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOR	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	1.93	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.02	+0.67

Drawdowns

AOR vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOR	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.44%	-16.41%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-3.36%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.77%	-4.74%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.18%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-9.51%	+6.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	0.87%	+0.65%

Volatility

AOR vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.43%. This indicates that AOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOR	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	1.43%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.81%	3.23%	+3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.40%	3.92%	+4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.55%	4.24%	+6.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.67%	4.24%	+6.43%

AOR vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOR vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than MFUL's 3.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF	2.46%	2.55%	2.66%	2.50%	2.12%	1.64%	1.89%	2.56%	2.49%	4.51%	2.16%	2.12%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.00%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOR and MFUL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, AOR and MFUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AOR or MFUL?

AOR has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to MFUL (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, AOR or MFUL?

On 3-year performance, AOR leads with 14.41% vs 5.05% for MFUL. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOR or MFUL?

Over the 3-year period, AOR has performed better with a 14.41% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOR or MFUL?

AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOR or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.46% for AOR.

What is the main difference between AOR and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.