AOR vs. FASIX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX).
AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. FASIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992.
Performance
AOR vs. FASIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOR vs. FASIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | -1.02% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
FASIX Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund | -0.58% | 9.58% | 5.34% | 8.00% | -10.20% | 4.04% | 8.62% | 10.64% | -1.63% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than FASIX's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has outperformed FASIX with an annualized return of 7.74%, while FASIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.
AOR
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
FASIX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOR vs. FASIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FASIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. FASIX — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
FASIX
AOR vs. FASIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOR | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.73 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.43 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.31 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.58 | 9.30 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOR | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.73 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.90 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.09 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and FASIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AOR vs. FASIX - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FASIX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.57% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
FASIX Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund | 3.21% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.17% | 4.55% | 1.63% | 2.16% | 3.02% | 4.11% | 3.23% | 1.85% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. FASIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than FASIX's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and FASIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -19.61% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -3.35% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -13.86% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -13.86% | -9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -3.21% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -1.79% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 0.83% | +0.92% |
Volatility
AOR vs. FASIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX) at 1.94%. This indicates that AOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 1.94% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.49% | 2.96% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.73% | 4.61% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 4.99% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.64% | 4.60% | +6.04% |