FASIX vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
FASIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
FASIX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASIX vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASIX Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund | -0.58% | 9.58% | 5.34% | 8.00% | -10.20% | 4.04% | 8.62% | 10.64% | -1.63% | 6.60% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.75% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 10.02% | 15.58% | -3.88% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASIX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FASIX has underperformed AOM with an annualized return of 4.12%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.82% annualized return.
FASIX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
AOM
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASIX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASIX vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank
FASIX
AOM
FASIX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASIX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.38 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 1.99 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.14 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 8.72 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASIX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.38 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.74 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.66 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASIX and AOM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASIX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
FASIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than AOM's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASIX Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund | 3.21% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.17% | 4.55% | 1.63% | 2.16% | 3.02% | 4.11% | 3.23% | 1.85% | 3.95% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.00% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
FASIX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASIX drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, roughly equal to the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASIX and AOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASIX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -19.96% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -5.35% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.86% | -19.96% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.86% | -19.96% | +6.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -3.64% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -2.72% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.31% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FASIX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX) is 1.94%, while iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that FASIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASIX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.94% | 3.27% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 4.88% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.61% | 8.23% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.99% | 8.09% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 7.90% | -3.30% |