AOR vs. CDDYX
AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) and CDDYX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class) are both funds - AOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while CDDYX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, AOR returned 8.52%/yr vs 12.81%/yr for CDDYX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CDDYX.
Performance
AOR vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than CDDYX's 9.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has underperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.
AOR
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
CDDYX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
AOR vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 6.83% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 9.15% | 15.95% | 15.17% | 10.65% | -4.84% | 26.43% | 7.92% | 28.74% | -4.27% | 20.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and CDDYX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between AOR and CDDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
CDDYX
AOR vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOR | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.80 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 14.30 | -3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOR vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum CDDYX drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and CDDYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -32.74% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -5.51% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -12.99% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -16.91% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -32.74% | +9.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -2.76% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.46% | +0.09% |
Volatility
AOR vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.70%. This indicates that AOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 2.70% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 6.96% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.85% | 9.19% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 13.29% | -2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 15.69% | -4.99% |
AOR vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOR vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than CDDYX's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 4.93% | 5.33% | 5.99% | 4.96% | 3.90% | 2.93% | 1.85% | 3.28% | 7.65% | 4.03% | 3.84% | 8.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOR and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOR has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to CDDYX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.
CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOR and CDDYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer