PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOM vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOM vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has underperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 6.31%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


AOM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.49%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.32%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
6.31%

VYMI

1D
0.54%
1M
1.26%
YTD
12.90%
6M
14.90%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOM vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
4.75%13.28%7.95%12.38%-14.54%6.93%10.02%15.58%-3.88%11.63%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
12.90%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AOM and VYMI is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2016

0.77

The correlation between AOM and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOM vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOM
VYMI

Technology

27.9%
4.3%

Financial Services

16.1%
41.9%

Industrials

11.9%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

8.1%
4.0%

Healthcare

8.0%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
7.0%

Energy

4.3%
9.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
6.8%

Utilities

2.7%
5.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.3%

Technology

AOM
27.9%
VYMI
4.3%

Financial Services

AOM
16.1%
VYMI
41.9%

Industrials

AOM
11.9%
VYMI
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AOM
9.5%
VYMI
6.5%

Communication Services

AOM
8.1%
VYMI
4.0%

Healthcare

AOM
8.0%
VYMI
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

AOM
5.0%
VYMI
7.0%

Energy

AOM
4.3%
VYMI
9.5%

Basic Materials

AOM
4.2%
VYMI
6.8%

Utilities

AOM
2.7%
VYMI
5.6%

Real Estate

AOM
2.4%
VYMI
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOM vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOM
AOM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOM vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AOMVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.96

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

11.60

-0.76

AOM vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOM and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOM vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOMVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-40.00%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-10.14%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.85%

-12.84%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.96%

-24.05%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.96%

-40.00%

+20.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-6.30%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

2.59%

-1.40%

Volatility

AOM vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) is 2.82%, while Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that AOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOMVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

4.40%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.63%

11.15%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.90%

13.33%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

14.90%

-6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

16.85%

-8.89%

AOM vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOM vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than VYMI's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
2.99%2.98%3.10%2.79%2.27%1.56%2.02%2.66%2.53%3.31%2.14%1.98%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.39%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOM and VYMI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYMI has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to AOM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOM dropped -19.96% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 10-year performance, VYMI leads with 11.24% vs 6.31% for AOM. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, AOM has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOM.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.99% for AOM.

AOM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VYMI is Dividend. AOM tracks S&P Target Risk Moderate, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOM and 0.07% for VYMI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOM and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer