AOM vs. INPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX).
AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. INPFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012.
Performance
AOM vs. INPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOM vs. INPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.75% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 10.02% | 15.58% | -3.88% | 11.63% |
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 | -1.32% | 14.29% | 9.20% | 9.46% | -8.74% | 12.90% | 5.67% | 15.76% | -3.57% | 11.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly higher than INPFX's -1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has underperformed INPFX with an annualized return of 5.82%, while INPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.
AOM
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
INPFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOM vs. INPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than INPFX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AOM vs. INPFX — Risk / Return Rank
AOM
INPFX
AOM vs. INPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOM | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.89 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.55 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 6.91 | +1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOM | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.88 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOM and INPFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AOM vs. INPFX - Dividend Comparison
AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than INPFX's 5.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.00% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 | 5.61% | 5.61% | 5.15% | 4.76% | 4.84% | 4.38% | 5.54% | 4.53% | 4.79% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 3.85% |
Drawdowns
AOM vs. INPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum INPFX drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and INPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOM | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -21.31% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -6.25% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.96% | -15.37% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.96% | -21.31% | +1.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -5.13% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -2.32% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 1.40% | -0.09% |
Volatility
AOM vs. INPFX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) at 2.46%. This indicates that AOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOM | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.46% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.88% | 4.38% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.23% | 7.55% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 7.48% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.90% | 8.34% | -0.44% |