AOK vs. THRV
AOK (iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. AOK is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOK charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
AOK vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOK achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
AOK
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOK vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 4.26% | 1.36% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOK and THRV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOK vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
AOK
THRV
AOK vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOK | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOK | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.04 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
AOK vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOK | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -1.50% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.51% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -0.44% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility
AOK vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOK | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 2.92% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 2.92% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 2.92% | +3.79% |
AOK vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOK vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.28% | 3.28% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOK and THRV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AOK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.28% for AOK.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOK and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for AOK and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer