PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOCIX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Conservative (AOCIX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOCIX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AOCIX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 6.06%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.


AOCIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.07%
YTD
3.61%
6M
3.66%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.06%

QBDSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOCIX
American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Conservative
3.61%10.20%7.42%10.53%-14.05%9.03%12.83%16.06%-3.25%9.89%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.13%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AOCIX and QBDSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.50

Over the past year, AOCIX and QBDSX have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOCIX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOCIX
AOCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AOCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AOCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Conservative (AOCIX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOCIXQBDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.10

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

0.61

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

1.71

+7.38

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOCIX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOCIXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

0.53

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.17

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.15

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.16

+0.51

Drawdowns

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOCIX drawdown since its inception was -26.87%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOCIX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOCIXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.87%

-18.38%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-3.09%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.31%

-3.76%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-7.40%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.71%

-18.38%

-1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-7.94%

+7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-6.85%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.11%

+0.07%

Volatility

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Conservative (AOCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.68%. This indicates that AOCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOCIXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

0.68%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

2.38%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

3.59%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.82%

4.32%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.09%

5.25%

+2.84%

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOCIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOCIX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

AOCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than QBDSX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOCIX
American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Conservative
4.81%5.12%2.79%2.50%9.63%8.19%5.25%4.87%7.07%2.05%2.93%5.97%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.47%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOCIX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOCIX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to QBDSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOCIX dropped -26.87% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

AOCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOCIX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer