PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOA vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOA vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AOA has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.56%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


AOA

1D
-0.50%
1M
4.14%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.64%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.56%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOA vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
9.93%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%12.82%22.60%-7.86%20.05%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AOA and SLV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.28

AOA vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOA
SLV

Technology

27.4%

-

Financial Services

16.1%

-

Industrials

12.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%
100.0%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

AOA
27.4%
SLV

-

Financial Services

AOA
16.1%
SLV

-

Industrials

AOA
12.0%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

AOA
9.5%
SLV

-

Communication Services

AOA
8.3%
SLV

-

Healthcare

AOA
8.0%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

AOA
5.0%
SLV

-

Energy

AOA
4.3%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

AOA
4.2%
SLV
100.0%

Utilities

AOA
2.7%
SLV

-

Real Estate

AOA
2.4%
SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOA vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOA vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOASLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.62

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

5.64

+7.56

AOA vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOA and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOASLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.89

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.58

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.49

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.25

+0.45

Drawdowns

AOA vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOASLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-76.28%

+47.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-42.45%

+34.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-42.45%

+29.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-42.45%

+18.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

-42.81%

+14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-37.30%

+36.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-44.67%

+40.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

19.67%

-17.83%

Volatility

AOA vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) is 3.25%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that AOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOASLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

16.30%

-13.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

58.31%

-49.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

58.90%

-48.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

36.15%

-23.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.55%

31.84%

-18.29%

AOA vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOA vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.04%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOA and SLV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to AOA (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 10.56% for AOA. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOA has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

AOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

AOA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SLV is Silver. AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.50% for SLV.

AOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOA and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer