PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOA vs. RAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOA vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than RAAX's 18.87% return.


AOA

1D
0.18%
1M
3.39%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.89%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.53%

RAAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
18.87%
6M
18.93%
1Y
36.89%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOA vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
10.13%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%12.82%22.60%-7.89%
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
18.87%26.74%12.50%6.71%1.51%21.56%-8.27%6.14%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AOA and RAAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between AOA and RAAX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AOA vs. RAAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOA
RAAX

Technology

27.4%
1.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
0.0%

Industrials

12.0%
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
1.0%

Communication Services

8.3%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
0.5%

Energy

4.3%
32.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
17.4%

Utilities

2.7%
13.0%

Real Estate

2.4%
5.0%

Technology

AOA
27.4%
RAAX
1.7%

Financial Services

AOA
16.1%
RAAX
0.0%

Industrials

AOA
12.0%
RAAX
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AOA
9.5%
RAAX
1.0%

Communication Services

AOA
8.3%
RAAX
0.1%

Healthcare

AOA
8.0%
RAAX
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

AOA
5.0%
RAAX
0.5%

Energy

AOA
4.3%
RAAX
32.6%

Basic Materials

AOA
4.2%
RAAX
17.4%

Utilities

AOA
2.7%
RAAX
13.0%

Real Estate

AOA
2.4%
RAAX
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOA vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RAAX
RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOA vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOARAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

5.60

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

20.79

-7.66

AOA vs. RAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the RAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOA and RAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOARAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.73

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.87

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.62

+0.08

Drawdowns

AOA vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum RAAX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and RAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOARAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-33.91%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-6.62%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-11.59%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-23.55%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-2.76%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-6.78%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.78%

+0.07%

Volatility

AOA vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 2.90%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOARAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.90%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

11.57%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

13.60%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

15.60%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

15.75%

-2.21%

AOA vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOA vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison

AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than RAAX's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.04%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
1.97%2.34%1.91%3.66%1.53%8.72%6.27%2.37%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOA and RAAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOA has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to RAAX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs RAAX's -33.91%.

On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.48% vs 9.19% for AOA. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.

AOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.97% for RAAX.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.78% for RAAX.

RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOA and RAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer