AOA vs. PTIN
AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - AOA tracks the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index while PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AOA returned 8.77%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for PTIN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.
Performance
AOA vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.65% return.
AOA
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
PTIN
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- 33.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- —
AOA vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.51% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 8.93% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 16.65% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | -0.56% | 6.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and PTIN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AOA and PTIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOA vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank
AOA
PTIN
AOA vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOA | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.87 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 10.82 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOA vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, which is greater than PTIN's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and PTIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOA | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.38% | -21.27% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -11.55% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.94% | -13.93% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.62% | -21.27% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.76% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -7.63% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 3.06% | -1.17% |
Volatility
AOA vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) is 4.31%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that AOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOA | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 7.10% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 15.33% | -6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.18% | 17.36% | -6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 14.65% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 14.07% | -0.56% |
AOA vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOA vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than PTIN's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.07% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, AOA and PTIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTIN has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to AOA (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs PTIN's -21.27%.
On 5-year performance, AOA leads with 8.77% vs 6.63% for PTIN. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOA has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AOA has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 2.07% for AOA.
AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOA and PTIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer