AOA vs. CVY
AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) and CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - AOA tracks the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index while CVY tracks the Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AOA returned 10.24%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for CVY. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AOA charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CVY.
Performance
AOA vs. CVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than CVY's 16.07% return. Over the past 10 years, AOA has outperformed CVY with an annualized return of 10.24%, while CVY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.
AOA
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.49%
CVY
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.91M | $10.17M | $10.41M | |
| $102.01K | $97.13K | $111.79K |
AOA vs. CVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 10.08% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 16.07% | 11.00% | 10.28% | 17.87% | -9.27% | 25.31% | -10.56% | 25.97% | -10.77% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and CVY is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AOA and CVY has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOA vs. CVY — Risk / Return Rank
AOA
CVY
AOA vs. CVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOA | CVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.16 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 10.85 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOA vs. CVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum CVY drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and CVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOA | CVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.38% | -66.86% | +38.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -7.43% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.94% | -16.79% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.62% | -21.58% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.38% | -50.47% | +22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.49% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -10.33% | +6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.16% | -0.22% |
Volatility
AOA vs. CVY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) at 2.86%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOA | CVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 2.86% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.63% | 7.80% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 10.78% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 16.06% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 19.47% | -5.96% |
AOA vs. CVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CVY's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOA vs. CVY - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than CVY's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.11% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.09% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOA and CVY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOA has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to CVY (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs CVY's -66.86%.
On 10-year performance, AOA leads with 10.24% vs 8.85% for CVY. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CVY has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AOA has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 2.11% for AOA.
AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while CVY tracks Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 1.21% for CVY.
CVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOA and CVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer