AOA vs. CLSM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) and CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOA is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while CLSM is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AOA returned 17.52%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for CLSM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CLSM.

Performance

AOA vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than CLSM's 20.45% return.

AOA

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 4.14%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 24.29%
• 3Y*: 17.52%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

CLSM

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 20.45%
• 6M: 20.19%
• 1Y: 34.21%
• 3Y*: 13.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOA vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF	9.93%	19.59%	13.55%	18.27%	-16.23%	3.89%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	20.45%	15.32%	1.87%	3.78%	-23.23%	9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AOA and CLSM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.72

The correlation between AOA and CLSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AOA vs. CLSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOA	CLSM
Technology	27.4%	51.8%
Financial Services	16.1%	0.1%
Industrials	12.0%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	4.4%
Communication Services	8.3%	5.5%
Healthcare	8.0%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	34.8%
Energy	4.3%	0.2%
Basic Materials	4.2%	0.4%
Utilities	2.7%	0.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.0%

Return for Risk

AOA vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA

AOA Risk / Return Rank: 67
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 82
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOA vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOA	CLSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.71	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.58	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.50	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	4.04	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.20	16.72	-3.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOA vs. CLSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the CLSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOA and CLSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOA	CLSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.71	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.35	+0.34

Drawdowns

AOA vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSM drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and CLSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOA	CLSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.38%	-27.77%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.20%	-8.50%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.94%	-14.60%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.38%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-16.49%	+12.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	2.05%	-0.21%

Volatility

AOA vs. CLSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) is 3.25%, while Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that AOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOA	CLSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	3.58%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	10.54%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	12.70%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	12.47%	+0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.55%	12.47%	+1.08%

AOA vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOA vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison

AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than CLSM's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF	2.04%	2.18%	2.30%	2.22%	2.10%	1.67%	1.71%	2.50%	2.37%	5.09%	2.26%	2.15%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.75%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOA and CLSM in my portfolio?

AOA and CLSM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOA or CLSM?

CLSM has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to AOA (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs CLSM's -27.77%.

Which ETF is better, AOA or CLSM?

On 3-year performance, AOA leads with 17.52% vs 13.75% for CLSM. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOA has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOA or CLSM?

Over the 3-year period, AOA has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 13.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOA or CLSM?

AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOA or CLSM?

AOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.75% for CLSM.

What is the main difference between AOA and CLSM?

AOA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CLSM is Tactical Allocation. AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while CLSM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.82% for CLSM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.