PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANGL vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANGL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 31.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 5.77%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


ANGL

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.07%
6M
1.41%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
5.77%
ALL TIME*
6.80%

XLE

1D
0.45%
1M
8.53%
6M
23.17%
YTD
31.38%
1Y
39.01%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
23.06%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
2.15%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
31.38%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and XLE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012

0.31

The correlation between ANGL and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANGL vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANGLXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.62

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

6.99

-0.25

ANGL vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANGLXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.31%

-71.26%

+41.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-14.98%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-20.14%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-26.04%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

-66.81%

+37.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-6.72%

+6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-17.95%

+14.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

5.60%

-4.64%

Volatility

ANGL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 0.74%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANGLXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

5.95%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

16.52%

-12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

20.98%

-16.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

25.82%

-18.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.23%

29.59%

-20.36%

ANGL vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANGL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than XLE's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.46%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.62%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANGL and XLE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to ANGL (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.80% vs 5.77% for ANGL. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.80% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANGL.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 2.62% for XLE.

ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. ANGL tracks ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANGL and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANGL and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer