ANGL vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANGL returned 6.27%/yr vs 37.68%/yr for SMH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

ANGL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 6.27%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.

ANGL

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 6.27%

SMH

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 77.13%
• 6M: 75.61%
• 1Y: 157.20%
• 3Y*: 64.17%
• 5Y*: 39.21%
• 10Y*: 37.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	77.13%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and SMH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012	0.42

The correlation between ANGL and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANGL vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANGL	SMH
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ANGL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 52
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANGL	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	5.19	-3.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	5.22	-2.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.72	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	10.59	-8.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	40.63	-32.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANGL vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANGL	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	5.19	-3.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	1.13	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	1.16	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.34	+0.40

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANGL	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-84.96%	+55.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-14.93%	+10.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.48%	-35.74%	+30.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-45.30%	+26.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	-45.30%	+15.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	0.00%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-41.09%	+37.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	3.89%	-2.93%

Volatility

ANGL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.37%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANGL	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	11.47%	-10.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	24.29%	-20.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	30.56%	-26.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	35.01%	-27.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	32.57%	-23.29%

ANGL vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ANGL and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

ANGL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.37%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.17%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANGL and SMH in my portfolio?

ANGL and SMH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANGL or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to ANGL (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, ANGL or SMH?

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.68% vs 6.27% for ANGL. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ANGL or SMH?

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.68% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANGL or SMH?

ANGL and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANGL or SMH?

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.

What is the main difference between ANGL and SMH?

ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SMH is Semiconductors. ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.