ANF vs. SHOO
ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) and SHOO (Steven Madden, Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ANF in Apparel Retail, SHOO in Footwear & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, ANF returned 19.26%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for SHOO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANF vs. SHOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -28.04% return, which is significantly lower than SHOO's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has outperformed SHOO with an annualized return of 19.26%, while SHOO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.
ANF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 25.97%
- YTD
- -28.04%
- 6M
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.26%
SHOO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 20.41%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 95.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
ANF vs. SHOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -28.04% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd. | 12.04% | 0.63% | 3.21% | 34.62% | -29.52% | 33.46% | -17.43% | 44.42% | -1.19% | 30.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and SHOO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ANF and SHOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ANF:
$4.14B
SHOO:
$3.32B
ANF:
$10.45
SHOO:
$1.07
ANF:
8.67
SHOO:
43.26
ANF:
0.81
SHOO:
1.25
ANF:
3.09
SHOO:
3.63
ANF:
$5.28B
SHOO:
$2.63B
ANF:
$2.56B
SHOO:
$1.18B
ANF:
$727.85M
SHOO:
$148.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANF vs. SHOO — Risk / Return Rank
ANF
SHOO
ANF vs. SHOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANF | SHOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 3.03 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 8.12 | -7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANF vs. SHOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than SHOO's maximum drawdown of -77.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and SHOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANF | SHOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -77.06% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | -31.73% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.89% | -60.21% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -60.21% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | -60.21% | -12.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.91% | -3.07% | -49.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.90% | -22.84% | -20.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.42% | 11.81% | +12.61% |
Volatility
ANF vs. SHOO - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 15.82% compared to Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) at 9.14%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANF | SHOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.82% | 9.14% | +6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.52% | 30.48% | +8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.90% | 44.24% | +17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.04% | 39.11% | +21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.00% | 40.39% | +20.61% |
Dividends
ANF vs. SHOO - Dividend Comparison
ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd. | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.98% | 2.00% | 2.63% | 1.29% | 0.42% | 1.33% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ANF vs. SHOO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Steven Madden, Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANF vs. SHOO - Profitability Comparison
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SHOO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steven Madden, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 357.42M and revenue of 653.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.7%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
SHOO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steven Madden, Ltd. reported an operating income of 98.74M and revenue of 653.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
SHOO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steven Madden, Ltd. reported a net income of 71.82M and revenue of 653.10M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANF and SHOO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to SHOO (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs SHOO's -77.06%.
SHOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANF and SHOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer