ANEW vs. SQQQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ANEW (ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - ANEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANEW returned 3.32%/yr vs -45.88%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. ANEW charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.

Performance

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANEW achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -38.86% return.

ANEW

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 0.83%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

SQQQ

• 1D: 5.01%
• 1M: 8.33%
• 6M: -36.79%
• YTD: -38.86%
• 1Y: -54.36%
• 3Y*: -50.96%
• 5Y*: -45.88%
• 10Y*: -55.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	3.22%	12.01%	19.37%	22.81%	-29.62%	6.95%	5.40%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	-38.86%	-53.05%	-49.79%	-73.61%	82.40%	-60.87%	-26.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ANEW and SQQQ is -0.74, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020	-0.87

The correlation between ANEW and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.87 (all time) to -0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANEW	SQQQ
Technology	26.0%	-
Healthcare	22.5%	-
Communication Services	14.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	-
Basic Materials	10.9%	-
Industrials	6.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Financial Services	3.8%	109.1%
Real Estate	0.2%	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ANEW vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEW

ANEW Risk / Return Rank: 13
ANEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ANEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ANEW Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ANEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ANEW Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SQQQ

SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ANEW	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	-0.98	+1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	-1.58	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.83	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	-0.89	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	-1.63	+2.33

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANEW and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEW drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEW and SQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANEW	SQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.87%	-100.00%	+60.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.12%	-61.03%	+44.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.26%	-92.51%	+72.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.87%	-97.27%	+57.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-100.00%	+98.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.16%	-92.76%	+79.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.75%	33.36%	-27.61%

Volatility

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is 3.43%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that ANEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANEW	SQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	22.32%	-18.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.70%	46.22%	-35.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	55.87%	-42.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	67.91%	-49.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	66.57%	-47.84%

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANEW vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ANEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SQQQ's 9.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	0.53%	0.54%	1.08%	0.87%	1.05%	0.24%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	9.77%	9.36%	10.23%	8.01%	0.28%	0.00%	2.15%	2.92%	1.47%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANEW and SQQQ in my portfolio?

ANEW and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANEW or SQQQ?

SQQQ has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to ANEW (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANEW dropped -39.87% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, ANEW or SQQQ?

On 5-year performance, ANEW leads with 3.32% vs -45.88% for SQQQ. On fees, ANEW is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ANEW has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ANEW or SQQQ?

Over the 5-year period, ANEW has performed better with a 3.32% return vs -45.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANEW or SQQQ?

ANEW is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANEW or SQQQ?

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.77%, compared with 0.53% for ANEW.

What is the main difference between ANEW and SQQQ?

ANEW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. ANEW tracks MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ANEW and 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.