ANEW vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ANEW (ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ANEW is passively managed, while FITZ is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANEW charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.

Performance

ANEW vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ANEW

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 2.56%
• 3Y*: 12.64%
• 5Y*: 2.65%
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANEW vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	-1.47%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ANEW and FITZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.70

Return for Risk

ANEW vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEW

ANEW Risk / Return Rank: 11
ANEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ANEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ANEW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ANEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ANEW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FITZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEW vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ANEW	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	—	—

Drawdowns

ANEW vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEW drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEW and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANEW	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.87%	-7.37%	-32.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-7.37%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-3.98%	-9.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ANEW	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	16.90%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	16.90%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	16.90%	+1.89%

ANEW vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANEW vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

ANEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	0.54%	0.54%	1.08%	0.87%	1.05%	0.24%	0.04%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANEW and FITZ in my portfolio?

ANEW and FITZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ANEW or FITZ?

On fees, ANEW is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANEW or FITZ?

ANEW is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANEW or FITZ?

ANEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between ANEW and FITZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ANEW and 0.75% for FITZ.