ANET vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANET (Arista Networks, Inc.) is a stock, while UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, ANET returned 42.93%/yr vs -11.98%/yr for UCO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ANET vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 26.70% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 139.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 42.93%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.98% annualized return.

ANET

• 1D: -4.79%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: 26.70%
• 6M: 29.14%
• 1Y: 74.86%
• 3Y*: 59.83%
• 5Y*: 49.95%
• 10Y*: 42.93%

UCO

• 1D: -3.93%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: 139.34%
• 6M: 124.58%
• 1Y: 115.57%
• 3Y*: 24.38%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: -11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	26.70%	18.55%	87.73%	94.07%	-15.58%	97.89%	42.86%	-3.46%	-10.56%	143.44%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	139.34%	-29.75%	5.36%	-13.89%	39.71%	139.26%	-92.91%	53.83%	-43.26%	0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and UCO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014	0.10

The correlation between ANET and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ANET vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 77
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 77

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANET	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.03	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.39	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.34	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	6.32	-0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANET vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANET	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	2.03	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.36	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96	-0.17	+1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	-0.34	+1.19

Drawdowns

ANET vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANET	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.20%	-99.95%	+47.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.33%	-34.77%	+6.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.42%	-50.38%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.42%	-67.24%	+16.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.20%	-98.75%	+46.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.59%	-99.26%	+92.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.40%	-85.49%	+70.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.48%	18.34%	-4.86%

Volatility

ANET vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) have volatilities of 21.64% and 20.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANET	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.64%	20.99%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.68%	46.57%	-6.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.88%	57.26%	-4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.09%	59.81%	-12.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.91%	71.35%	-26.44%

Dividends

ANET vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANET nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANET and UCO in my portfolio?

ANET and UCO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANET or UCO?

ANET has higher volatility (21.64%) compared to UCO (20.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs UCO's -99.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.