ANAB vs. AMSC
ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.) and AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) are both stocks. ANAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ANAB returned 26.26%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for AMSC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANAB vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAB achieves a 58.91% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 50.59% return.
ANAB
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -25.92%
- YTD
- 58.91%
- 6M
- 73.08%
- 1Y
- 225.06%
- 3Y*
- 60.31%
- 5Y*
- 26.26%
- 10Y*
- —
AMSC
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -21.47%
- YTD
- 50.59%
- 6M
- 33.52%
- 1Y
- 37.67%
- 3Y*
- 91.72%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
ANAB vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc. | 58.91% | 266.16% | -38.19% | -30.88% | -10.82% | 61.63% | 32.31% | -74.53% | -36.67% | 492.47% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 50.59% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -49.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAB and AMSC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2017 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
ANAB:
$1.47B
AMSC:
$2.03B
ANAB:
-$0.91
AMSC:
$3.05
ANAB:
6.51
AMSC:
6.36
ANAB:
115.60
AMSC:
3.65
ANAB:
$232.39M
AMSC:
$299.15M
ANAB:
$245.59M
AMSC:
$91.38M
ANAB:
$52.72M
AMSC:
$19.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANAB vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
ANAB
AMSC
ANAB vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAB | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.16 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.05 | 0.62 | +7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.07 | 1.05 | +19.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAB | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | 0.44 | +2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.04 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
ANAB vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAB drawdown since its inception was -92.08%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAB and AMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAB | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.08% | -99.57% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.15% | -61.08% | +32.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.32% | -63.86% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.32% | -82.94% | +13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.07% | -93.74% | +53.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.71% | -75.76% | +11.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.27% | 36.14% | -24.87% |
Volatility
ANAB vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) is 12.10%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 21.83%. This indicates that ANAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANAB | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 21.83% | -9.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.22% | 53.09% | -6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.91% | 85.36% | -16.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.30% | 87.23% | -21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.47% | 79.09% | -3.62% |
Dividends
ANAB vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANAB nor AMSC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ANAB vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AnaptysBio, Inc. and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ANAB and AMSC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (21.83%) compared to ANAB (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANAB dropped -92.08% vs AMSC's -99.57%.
ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANAB and AMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer