AMZY vs. ENFR
AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. AMZY is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZY returned 14.23% vs 25.40% for ENFR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
AMZY vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.60% return.
AMZY
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
AMZY vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.56% | 10.39% | 35.28% | 18.31% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.60% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZY and ENFR is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023 | 0.07 |
The correlation between AMZY and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZY vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
AMZY
ENFR
AMZY vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 2.95 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 8.06 | -6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.75 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.34 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
AMZY vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -68.28% | +44.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.61% | -8.64% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -4.95% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -15.98% | +10.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 3.16% | +4.72% |
Volatility
AMZY vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 6.01% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 6.18% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.09% | 11.47% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 14.64% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 19.30% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 24.69% | +0.37% |
AMZY vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZY vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.72%, more than ENFR's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 57.72% | 52.59% | 47.91% | 9.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.03% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZY and ENFR have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to AMZY (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 25.40% vs 14.23% for AMZY. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AMZY has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 25.40% return vs 14.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.
AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 57.72%, compared with 4.03% for ENFR.
AMZY is categorized as Options Trading, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZY and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZY and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer