PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. QSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. QSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly higher than QSR's 10.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed QSR with an annualized return of 21.72%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
15.32%
1M
11.91%
6M
13.49%
YTD
17.66%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
27.29%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
21.72%
ALL TIME*
30.20%

QSR

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.58%
6M
12.49%
YTD
10.44%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
8.56%
ALL TIME*
9.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.00B$11.21B$12.30B
$146.87M$201.15M$244.46M

AMZN vs. QSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
17.66%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
10.44%8.64%-13.80%24.64%10.72%2.72%-0.34%25.61%-12.15%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and QSR is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZN and QSR has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.92T

QSR:

$25.68B

EPS

AMZN:

$12.44

QSR:

$2.09

PE Ratio

AMZN:

21.82

QSR:

35.47

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.81

QSR:

3.53

PB Ratio

AMZN:

5.37

QSR:

9.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$775.68B

QSR:

$9.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$393.81B

QSR:

$3.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$254.00B

QSR:

$2.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. QSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QSR
QSR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZN vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNQSRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.06

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

2.19

-0.61

AMZN vs. QSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the QSR Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and QSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and QSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNQSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-63.03%

-31.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-12.45%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-24.53%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.73%

-27.93%

-27.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-63.03%

+6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-8.54%

+7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-12.00%

-16.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

6.01%

+4.25%

Volatility

AMZN vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison

Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 8.37%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNQSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.52%

8.37%

+8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.50%

18.97%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.20%

24.07%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.27%

22.81%

+13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.00%

27.54%

+5.46%

Dividends

AMZN vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.43%3.63%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%

Financials

AMZN vs. QSR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

AMZN vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and Restaurant Brands International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 104.83B and revenue of 200.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 27.46B and revenue of 200.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 62.65B and revenue of 200.61B, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and QSR have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZN has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to QSR (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs QSR's -63.03%.

QSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and QSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer