AMZN vs. GRMN
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) and GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) are both stocks. AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 21.19%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for GRMN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. GRMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than GRMN's 16.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMZN having a 21.19% annualized return and GRMN not far ahead at 21.88%.
AMZN
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 14.82%
- 3Y*
- 25.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
GRMN
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 33.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 21.88%
AMZN vs. GRMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 6.24% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 16.41% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and GRMN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2000 | 0.35 |
The correlation between AMZN and GRMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMZN:
$2.67T
GRMN:
$45.53B
AMZN:
$8.37
GRMN:
$8.97
AMZN:
29.29
GRMN:
26.23
AMZN:
0.71
GRMN:
2.11
AMZN:
3.58
GRMN:
6.10
AMZN:
6.03
GRMN:
4.91
AMZN:
$742.78B
GRMN:
$7.46B
AMZN:
$348.59B
GRMN:
$4.41B
AMZN:
$152.71B
GRMN:
$2.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. GRMN — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
GRMN
AMZN vs. GRMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZN | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 0.55 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 1.20 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZN | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.43 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.78 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.45 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. GRMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than GRMN's maximum drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and GRMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -87.71% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -27.97% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -27.97% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | -54.63% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -54.63% | -1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -12.07% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | -31.53% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 12.71% | -3.63% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. GRMN - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) have volatilities of 7.80% and 7.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 7.87% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.58% | 22.18% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 30.12% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 30.38% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 28.34% | +4.14% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. GRMN - Dividend Comparison
AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
Financials
AMZN vs. GRMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Garmin Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMZN vs. GRMN - Profitability Comparison
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
GRMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
GRMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
GRMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and GRMN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRMN has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to AMZN (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs GRMN's -87.71%.
GRMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and GRMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer