AMZN vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, AMZN returned 4.89%/yr vs -3.87%/yr for FLCH. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

AMZN vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -10.17% return.

AMZN

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 2.25%
• 6M: -2.95%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 1Y: 0.29%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 20.23%
• ALL TIME*: 29.53%

FLCH

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 4.49%
• 6M: -13.97%
• YTD: -10.17%
• 1Y: -6.50%
• 3Y*: 7.74%
• 5Y*: -3.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	$9.21B	$12.90B	$12.21B
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	$3.91M	$4.48M	$3.36M

AMZN vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	0.56%	5.21%	44.39%	80.88%	-49.62%	2.38%	76.26%	23.03%	28.43%	5.21%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-10.17%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and FLCH is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.39

The correlation between AMZN and FLCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMZN vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN

AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 45
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZN	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	-0.34	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	-0.36	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.96	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	-0.32	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	-0.68	+0.67

AMZN vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZN	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.40%	-62.09%	-32.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.74%	-21.48%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.88%	-25.43%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.73%	-50.38%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.59%	-36.68%	+21.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.13%	-30.62%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.06%	10.01%	+0.05%

Volatility

AMZN vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.99%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZN	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.77%	5.99%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.18%	13.93%	+8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.47%	19.83%	+11.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.75%	29.58%	+6.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.63%	27.80%	+4.83%

Dividends

AMZN vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.41%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZN and FLCH in my portfolio?

AMZN and FLCH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZN or FLCH?

AMZN has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to FLCH (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.