PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. CW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 38.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 21.42%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
3.13%
1M
-6.86%
YTD
6.59%
6M
10.55%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
21.42%

CW

1D
0.64%
1M
7.03%
YTD
38.43%
6M
39.42%
1Y
61.45%
3Y*
63.27%
5Y*
43.89%
10Y*
25.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
6.59%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
38.43%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%-16.83%38.70%-15.79%24.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and CW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.68T

CW:

$28.26B

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

CW:

$13.64

PE Ratio

AMZN:

29.39

CW:

55.91

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.71

CW:

3.05

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.59

CW:

7.92

PB Ratio

AMZN:

6.05

CW:

10.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

CW:

$3.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

CW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

CW:

$745.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNCWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.31

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

4.76

-4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

13.83

-12.09

AMZN vs. CW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and CW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and CW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNCWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-59.19%

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-12.97%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-27.21%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-27.21%

-28.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-48.73%

-7.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.53%

0.00%

-10.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-13.89%

-14.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.23%

4.46%

+4.77%

Volatility

AMZN vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 8.70%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNCWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

10.42%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

25.90%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.34%

33.02%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.57%

27.89%

+7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.51%

30.32%

+2.19%

Dividends

AMZN vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.16%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%

Financials

AMZN vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
913.69M
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMZN vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
36.3%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and CW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CW has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to AMZN (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs CW's -59.19%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and CW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer