AMZN vs. BMI
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) and BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) are both stocks. AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while BMI operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 21.42%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for BMI. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. BMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than BMI's -22.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed BMI with an annualized return of 21.42%, while BMI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.34% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
BMI
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 18.05%
- YTD
- -22.48%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- 1Y
- -44.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
AMZN vs. BMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 6.59% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -22.48% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 42.58% | 3.23% | 14.11% | 46.37% | 33.46% | 4.09% | 30.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and BMI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997 | 0.23 |
The correlation between AMZN and BMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMZN:
$2.68T
BMI:
$3.95B
AMZN:
$8.37
BMI:
$4.42
AMZN:
29.39
BMI:
30.38
AMZN:
0.71
BMI:
1.27
AMZN:
3.59
BMI:
4.42
AMZN:
6.05
BMI:
4.07
AMZN:
$742.78B
BMI:
$896.73M
AMZN:
$348.59B
BMI:
$370.96M
AMZN:
$152.71B
BMI:
$199.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. BMI — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
BMI
AMZN vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.80 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | -0.82 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | -1.33 | +3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than BMI's maximum drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and BMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -68.22% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -53.79% | +32.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -55.06% | +24.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | -55.06% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -55.06% | -1.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.53% | -46.57% | +36.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -19.03% | -9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.23% | 33.17% | -23.94% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 8.70%, while Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 9.60% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 38.63% | -17.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.34% | 44.31% | -13.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.57% | 33.91% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.51% | 33.69% | -1.18% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison
AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.19% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
Financials
AMZN vs. BMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Badger Meter, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMZN vs. BMI - Profitability Comparison
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.33M and revenue of 202.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.7%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
BMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.17M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
BMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 27.34M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and BMI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMI has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to AMZN (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs BMI's -68.22%.
AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and BMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer