PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN.NEO achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT.NEO's -17.91% return.


AMZN.NEO

1D
3.14%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
5.45%
6M
8.99%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
22.80%
5Y*
10Y*

MSFT.NEO

1D
2.25%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-17.91%
6M
-16.55%
1Y
-17.17%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMZN.NEO
Amazon.com CDR
5.45%2.68%41.82%78.72%-50.79%4.39%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
-17.91%12.61%11.26%56.34%-29.26%16.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN.NEO and MSFT.NEO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZN.NEO and MSFT.NEO has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN.NEO:

CA$301.80B

MSFT.NEO:

CA$209.09B

EPS

AMZN.NEO:

$7.17

MSFT.NEO:

$14.11

PE Ratio

AMZN.NEO:

2.82

MSFT.NEO:

1.43

PS Ratio

AMZN.NEO:

0.31

MSFT.NEO:

0.51

PB Ratio

AMZN.NEO:

0.58

MSFT.NEO:

0.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN.NEO:

$691.33B

MSFT.NEO:

$293.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN.NEO:

$345.98B

MSFT.NEO:

$202.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN.NEO
AMZN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT.NEO
MSFT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZN.NEOMSFT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.89

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

-0.50

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.38

-1.00

+2.38

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN.NEO and MSFT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than MSFT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.NEO and MSFT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZN.NEOMSFT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-37.95%

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.03%

-34.54%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.29%

-34.54%

+3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.08%

-27.08%

+16.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.74%

-12.46%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.56%

17.18%

-7.62%

Volatility

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) is 8.58%, while Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that AMZN.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZN.NEOMSFT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

10.69%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

22.31%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.83%

25.27%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.55%

27.17%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.55%

27.17%

+8.38%

Dividends

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

AMZN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AMZN.NEO
Amazon.com CDR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
0.89%0.70%0.73%0.75%1.07%0.19%

Financials

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com CDR and Microsoft Corp CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B100.00B150.00B200.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
180.17B
77.67B
(AMZN.NEO) Total Revenue
(MSFT.NEO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMZN.NEO vs. MSFT.NEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com CDR and Microsoft Corp CDR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
50.8%
69.1%
Portfolio components
AMZN.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported a gross profit of 91.50B and revenue of 180.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.8%.

MSFT.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a gross profit of 53.63B and revenue of 77.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

AMZN.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported an operating income of 17.42B and revenue of 180.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

MSFT.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported an operating income of 37.96B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

AMZN.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com CDR reported a net income of 21.19B and revenue of 180.17B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

MSFT.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a net income of 27.75B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN.NEO and MSFT.NEO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN.NEO and MSFT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer