PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AMZI.L vs. METI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AMZI.L vs. METI.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AMZI.L (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP) and METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) and IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMZI.L is traded in USD, while METI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the METI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

AMZI.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

METI.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP

IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP

Often compared with AMZI.L:
AMZI.L vs. NVDI.LAMZI.L vs. TSLI.LAMZI.L vs. MSTYAMZI.L vs. GOOI.LAMZI.L vs. JEPI.LAMZI.L vs. 3QQQ.LAMZI.L vs. GLDE.L
Often compared with METI.L:
METI.L vs. AMDI.LMETI.L vs. TLTI.LMETI.L vs. SOXL.LMETI.L vs. JEPE.LMETI.L vs. SMH3.LMETI.L vs. QQQY.LMETI.L vs. 3QQQ.L

Return for Risk

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) and IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMZI.L and METI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

AMZI.L vs. METI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZI.L nor METI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMZI.L and METI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZI.L and METI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer