PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) and IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZI.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP
-19.85%4.42%15.12%
GLDE.L
IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP
0.66%53.59%-4.67%
Different Trading Currencies

AMZI.L is traded in USD, while GLDE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLDE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZI.L achieves a -19.85% return, which is significantly lower than GLDE.L's 0.66% return.


AMZI.L

1D
1.21%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-19.85%
6M
-17.88%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDE.L

1D
2.85%
1M
-10.73%
YTD
0.66%
6M
9.01%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDE.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZI.L
AMZI.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AMZI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDE.L
GLDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GLDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) and IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZI.LGLDE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

1.23

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.03

1.60

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

1.53

-1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.62

5.86

-6.47

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the GLDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZI.L and GLDE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZI.LGLDE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

1.23

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

1.61

-1.70

Correlation

The correlation between AMZI.L and GLDE.L is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Dividend Comparison

AMZI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.58%, more than GLDE.L's 4.96% yield.


TTM20252024
AMZI.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP
15.58%13.65%2.45%
GLDE.L
IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP
4.96%4.82%0.38%

Drawdowns

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZI.L drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, which is greater than GLDE.L's maximum drawdown of -18.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZI.L and GLDE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZI.LGLDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.38%

-16.63%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.38%

-16.63%

-10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.36%

-10.56%

-14.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-2.33%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.64%

4.17%

+6.47%

Volatility

AMZI.L vs. GLDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) is 8.38%, while IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that AMZI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMZI.LGLDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

10.52%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.36%

19.48%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.22%

23.33%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.10%

19.92%

+9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.10%

19.92%

+9.18%