AMZD vs. QDVO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. AMZD is passively managed, while QDVO is actively managed. Over the past year, AMZD returned -11.94% vs 19.89% for QDVO. At a correlation of -0.67, they often move in opposite directions. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.

Performance

AMZD vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 8.19% return.

AMZD

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -3.89%
• 6M: -2.11%
• YTD: -8.31%
• 1Y: -11.94%
• 3Y*: -20.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: 7.45%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 1Y: 19.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZD vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	-8.31%	-9.84%	-18.27%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	8.19%	20.16%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZD and QDVO is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	-0.67

The correlation between AMZD and QDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.67 to -0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMZD vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZD

AMZD Risk / Return Rank: 6
AMZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 55
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZD vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZD	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	1.56	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	2.19	-2.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.28	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	1.96	-2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	7.31	-8.21

AMZD vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZD and QDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZD vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZD	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-17.75%	-55.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-10.21%	-18.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.17%	-2.39%	-67.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.60%	-2.43%	-47.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.24%	2.73%	+10.51%

Volatility

AMZD vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 4.36%. This indicates that AMZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZD	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	4.36%	+5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.89%	9.94%	+11.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.15%	12.84%	+18.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.38%	17.44%	+15.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.38%	17.44%	+15.94%

AMZD vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZD vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than QDVO's 10.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	3.38%	3.61%	5.15%	6.83%	2.45%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.50%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZD and QDVO in my portfolio?

AMZD and QDVO have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZD or QDVO?

AMZD has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to QDVO (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs QDVO's -17.75%.

Which ETF is better, AMZD or QDVO?

On 1-year performance, QDVO leads with 19.89% vs -11.94% for AMZD. On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, QDVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZD or QDVO?

Over the 1-year period, QDVO has performed better with a 19.89% return vs -11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZD or QDVO?

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZD or QDVO?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.50%, compared with 3.38% for AMZD.

What is the main difference between AMZD and QDVO?

AMZD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 0.56% for QDVO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.