PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZD vs. AMZP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZD vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -18.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMZP's 10.90% return.


AMZD

1D
-15.20%
1M
-13.01%
6M
-15.74%
YTD
-18.67%
1Y
-25.04%
3Y*
-24.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.25%

AMZP

1D
13.50%
1M
9.15%
6M
9.17%
YTD
10.90%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$135.48M$132.64M$131.29M
$255.54K$291.65K$426.86K

AMZD vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZD
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares
-18.67%-9.84%-30.80%-8.19%
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF
10.90%9.56%37.42%7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZD and AMZP is -0.98, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

-0.98

The correlation between AMZD and AMZP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZD vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZD
AMZD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
AMZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZD vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZDAMZPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.10

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

0.55

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

1.20

-2.57

AMZD vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZD and AMZP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZD vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.54%, which is greater than AMZP's maximum drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and AMZP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZDAMZPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.54%

-27.36%

-46.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.56%

-23.64%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.54%

-5.37%

-68.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.89%

-6.46%

-43.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.01%

10.74%

+3.27%

Volatility

AMZD vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) at 15.36%. This indicates that AMZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZDAMZPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

15.36%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.88%

27.48%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.31%

34.01%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.25%

28.49%

+5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.25%

28.49%

+5.76%

AMZD vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZD vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than AMZP's 18.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMZD
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares
3.81%3.61%5.15%6.83%2.45%
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF
18.33%22.04%15.15%2.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZD and AMZP have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZD has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to AMZP (15.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.54% vs AMZP's -27.36%.

On 1-year performance, AMZP leads with 21.38% vs -25.04% for AMZD. On fees, AMZP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZP has been the lower-risk option at 15.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZP has performed better with a 21.38% return vs -25.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 18.33%, compared with 3.81% for AMZD.

AMZD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AMZP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 0.99% for AMZP.

AMZP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZD and AMZP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer