AMZA vs. WEEK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus, while WEEK is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZA returned 23.26% vs 3.70% for WEEK. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for WEEK.

Performance

AMZA vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 30.46% return, which is significantly higher than WEEK's 2.03% return.

AMZA

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.94%
• 6M: 21.61%
• YTD: 30.46%
• 1Y: 23.26%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 22.88%
• 10Y*: 5.46%
• ALL TIME*: -0.35%

WEEK

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.79%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	$1.66M	$1.65M	$1.75M
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	$3.50M	$3.29M	$3.82M

AMZA vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	30.46%	-7.54%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	2.03%	3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZA and WEEK is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

AMZA vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 47
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

WEEK

WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 99
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZA vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZA	WEEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	8.76	-7.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	18.32	-16.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	4.36	-3.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	28.82	-26.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	248.42	-243.91

AMZA vs. WEEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the WEEK Sharpe Ratio of 8.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and WEEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and WEEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZA	WEEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.46%	-0.13%	-91.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-0.13%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.13%	0.00%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.51%	-0.01%	-44.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	0.02%	+5.00%

Volatility

AMZA vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.10%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZA	WEEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	0.10%	+5.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	0.25%	+13.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	0.43%	+17.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.27%	0.39%	+24.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.14%	0.39%	+36.75%

AMZA vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZA vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, more than WEEK's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	7.83%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	3.63%	3.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZA and WEEK in my portfolio?

AMZA and WEEK have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZA or WEEK?

AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to WEEK (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs WEEK's -0.13%.

Which ETF is better, AMZA or WEEK?

On 1-year performance, AMZA leads with 23.26% vs 3.70% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZA or WEEK?

Over the 1-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 23.26% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZA or WEEK?

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZA or WEEK?

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 3.63% for WEEK.

What is the main difference between AMZA and WEEK?

AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.19% for WEEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.76 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.