AMZA vs. VABS
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and VABS (Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while VABS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMZA returned 19.41%/yr vs 3.22%/yr for VABS. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VABS.
Performance
AMZA vs. VABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly higher than VABS's 1.39% return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
VABS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZA vs. VABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 30.12% |
VABS Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF | 1.39% | 5.40% | 7.59% | 7.61% | -5.24% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and VABS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021 | -0.04 |
The correlation between AMZA and VABS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. VABS — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
VABS
AMZA vs. VABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZA | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.46 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 4.34 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 11.20 | -7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZA | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.10 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 1.41 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 1.40 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. VABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than VABS's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and VABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -7.12% | -84.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -0.98% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -1.42% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -7.12% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.19% | -0.14% | -10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -1.42% | -43.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 0.38% | +4.44% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. VABS - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) at 0.40%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 0.40% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 1.07% | +12.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 2.04% | +15.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 2.30% | +23.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.25% | 2.24% | +35.01% |
AMZA vs. VABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VABS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. VABS - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than VABS's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
VABS Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF | 5.18% | 4.94% | 5.05% | 4.13% | 2.47% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and VABS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to VABS (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs VABS's -7.12%.
On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 19.41% vs 3.22% for VABS. On fees, VABS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, VABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 19.41% return vs 3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VABS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 5.18% for VABS.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while VABS is Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.39% for VABS.
VABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and VABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer