PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZA vs. PII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZA vs. PII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly higher than PII's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has outperformed PII with an annualized return of 4.86%, while PII has yielded a comparatively lower 0.86% annualized return.


AMZA

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
22.22%
6M
20.41%
1Y
17.55%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
19.41%
10Y*
4.86%

PII

1D
0.10%
1M
10.18%
YTD
10.30%
6M
4.61%
1Y
75.63%
3Y*
-12.69%
5Y*
-8.47%
10Y*
0.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZA vs. PII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
22.22%0.17%30.90%23.35%33.20%51.22%-49.25%6.27%-26.78%-6.90%
PII
Polaris Industries Inc.
10.30%15.90%-37.19%-3.79%-6.01%17.75%-3.78%36.37%-36.76%54.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZA and PII is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2014

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZA and PII has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZA vs. PII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZA
AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PII
PII Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PII Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PII Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PII Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZA vs. PII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZAPIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.22

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

6.47

-2.82

AMZA vs. PII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the PII Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and PII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZAPIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.37

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

-0.20

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.02

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.41

-0.43

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. PII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than PII's maximum drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and PII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZAPIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.46%

-77.57%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-34.21%

+22.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.56%

-75.23%

+56.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-75.23%

+50.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.84%

-75.62%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.19%

-44.66%

+34.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.02%

-19.73%

-25.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

11.72%

-6.90%

Volatility

AMZA vs. PII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is 5.80%, while Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that AMZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZAPIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

13.54%

-7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

37.61%

-24.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

56.09%

-38.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.84%

42.68%

-16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.25%

42.77%

-5.52%

Dividends

AMZA vs. PII - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than PII's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
8.02%8.81%7.29%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
PII
Polaris Industries Inc.
3.95%4.24%4.58%2.74%2.53%2.29%2.60%2.40%3.13%1.87%2.67%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZA and PII have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PII has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to AMZA (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs PII's -77.57%.

PII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZA and PII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer