AMZA vs. PII
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) is MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while PII (Polaris Industries Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AMZA returned 4.86%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PII. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZA vs. PII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly higher than PII's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has outperformed PII with an annualized return of 4.86%, while PII has yielded a comparatively lower 0.86% annualized return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
PII
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 75.63%
- 3Y*
- -12.69%
- 5Y*
- -8.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.86%
AMZA vs. PII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
PII Polaris Industries Inc. | 10.30% | 15.90% | -37.19% | -3.79% | -6.01% | 17.75% | -3.78% | 36.37% | -36.76% | 54.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and PII is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2014 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMZA and PII has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. PII — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
PII
AMZA vs. PII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZA | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.22 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 6.47 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZA | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.37 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | -0.20 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.02 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.41 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. PII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than PII's maximum drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and PII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -77.57% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -34.21% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -75.23% | +56.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -75.23% | +50.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | -75.62% | -11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.19% | -44.66% | +34.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -19.73% | -25.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 11.72% | -6.90% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. PII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is 5.80%, while Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that AMZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 13.54% | -7.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 37.61% | -24.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 56.09% | -38.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 42.68% | -16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.25% | 42.77% | -5.52% |
Dividends
AMZA vs. PII - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than PII's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
PII Polaris Industries Inc. | 3.95% | 4.24% | 4.58% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 2.29% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 3.13% | 1.87% | 2.67% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and PII have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PII has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to AMZA (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs PII's -77.57%.
PII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and PII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer