AMZA vs. JEPQ
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. AMZA is actively managed, while JEPQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZA returned 22.25%/yr vs 19.91%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 21.82% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.85% return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 21.82%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 21.82% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 8.54% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.85% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and JEPQ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.25 |
The correlation between AMZA and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZA
JEPQ
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
AMZA
JEPQ
Utilities
AMZA
JEPQ
Basic Materials
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Communication Services
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Financial Services
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Healthcare
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Industrials
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Real Estate
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Technology
AMZA
-
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
JEPQ
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZA | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.91 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 13.84 | -10.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -20.07% | -71.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -8.82% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -20.07% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -1.64% | -8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.92% | -3.41% | -41.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 1.85% | +3.02% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 4.98%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 4.98% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 10.22% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 12.61% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 16.73% | +9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.21% | 16.73% | +20.48% |
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, less than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.05% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.22% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, AMZA leads with 22.25% vs 19.91% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 22.25% return vs 19.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 8.05% for AMZA.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer