EMO vs. SRV
EMO (ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund) and SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) are both mutual funds - EMO is a MLPs fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SRV is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by NXG. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMO returned 7.15%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for SRV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMO charges 13.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SRV.
Performance
EMO vs. SRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMO achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 31.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EMO has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of 7.15%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
EMO
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 17.56%
- 1Y
- 20.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.48%
- 5Y*
- 26.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
SRV
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 35.27%
- 1Y
- 41.53%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 25.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
EMO vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 16.33% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 31.90% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMO and SRV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2011 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EMO and SRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMO vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank
EMO
SRV
EMO vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMO | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.18 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 9.03 | -4.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMO vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMO drawdown since its inception was -95.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMO and SRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMO | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.06% | -92.97% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -13.13% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -26.26% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.59% | -26.26% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.02% | -81.70% | -11.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -7.98% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.87% | -48.65% | +16.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 4.61% | +0.53% |
Volatility
EMO vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) is 4.72%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that EMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMO | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 7.42% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 15.76% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.79% | 19.52% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 26.44% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.23% | 38.30% | +2.93% |
EMO vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMO has a 13.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMO vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison
EMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, less than SRV's 15.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.65% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 15.66% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMO and SRV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to EMO (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMO dropped -95.06% vs SRV's -92.97%.
SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMO and SRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer