AMZA vs. DIVO
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMZA returned 17.67%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for DIVO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
AMZA vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 21.82% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 6.43% return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 21.82%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZA vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 21.82% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and DIVO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMZA and DIVO has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AMZA vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZA
DIVO
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
AMZA
DIVO
Utilities
AMZA
DIVO
Basic Materials
AMZA
-
DIVO
Communication Services
AMZA
-
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
AMZA
-
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
AMZA
-
DIVO
Financial Services
AMZA
-
DIVO
Healthcare
AMZA
-
DIVO
Industrials
AMZA
-
DIVO
Real Estate
AMZA
-
DIVO
-
Technology
AMZA
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
DIVO
AMZA vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 3.12 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 11.23 | -8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -30.04% | -61.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -5.95% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -12.12% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -13.72% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -0.19% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.92% | -2.61% | -42.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 1.65% | +3.22% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.71%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 2.71% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 7.13% | +6.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 9.20% | +8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 11.97% | +13.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.21% | 14.83% | +22.38% |
AMZA vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, more than DIVO's 6.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.05% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.36% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and DIVO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to DIVO (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 17.67% vs 10.91% for DIVO. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 6.36% for DIVO.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer