AMZA vs. BSMW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. AMZA is actively managed, while BSMW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZA returned 22.62%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.

Performance

AMZA vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 23.85% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.28% return.

AMZA

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 23.85%
• 6M: 20.59%
• 1Y: 21.48%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

BSMW

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZA vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	23.85%	0.17%	30.90%	15.22%
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	1.28%	3.42%	-0.35%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZA and BSMW is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023	-0.08

The correlation between AMZA and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.06 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMZA vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZA	BSMW
Energy	99.8%	-
Utilities	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

AMZA vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BSMW

BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 64
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZA vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZA	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.35	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	3.37	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.47	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	2.25	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.47	7.09	-2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZA vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZA	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.35	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.69	-0.71

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and BSMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZA	BSMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.46%	-7.57%	-83.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.16%	-2.92%	-9.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.56%	-7.34%	-11.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.99%	-1.00%	-7.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.01%	-1.72%	-43.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	0.92%	+3.90%

Volatility

AMZA vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.92%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZA	BSMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	0.92%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.37%	1.97%	+11.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.66%	2.81%	+14.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.85%	5.00%	+20.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.24%	5.00%	+32.24%

AMZA vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZA vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than BSMW's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	7.92%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	3.20%	3.24%	3.48%	2.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZA and BSMW in my portfolio?

AMZA and BSMW have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZA or BSMW?

AMZA has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to BSMW (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

Which ETF is better, AMZA or BSMW?

On 3-year performance, AMZA leads with 22.62% vs 3.23% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZA or BSMW?

Over the 3-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 22.62% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZA or BSMW?

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZA or BSMW?

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 7.92%, compared with 3.20% for BSMW.

What is the main difference between AMZA and BSMW?

AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.18% for BSMW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.