AMYY vs. CDC
AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CDC is a Low Volatility fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. AMYY is actively managed, while CDC is passively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.
Performance
AMYY vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 18.09% return.
AMYY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CDC
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $403.40K | $326.63K | $353.65K | |
| $1.04M | $983.49K | $1.23M |
AMYY vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 7.66% | 19.93% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 18.09% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMYY and CDC is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMYY vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
AMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CDC
AMYY vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMYY | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMYY vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum CDC drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and CDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMYY | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -21.37% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -1.72% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -5.05% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.61% | — |
Volatility
AMYY vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMYY | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.07% | 10.32% | +13.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 12.56% | +11.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 13.22% | +10.85% |
AMYY vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMYY vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.53%, more than CDC's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 108.53% | 30.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.05% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMYY and CDC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.
AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 108.53%, compared with 3.05% for CDC.
AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CDC is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.37% for CDC.
Find the right allocation for AMYY and CDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer