PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMWL vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMWL vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Well Corporation (AMWL) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMWL achieves a 72.30% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 6.07% return.


AMWL

1D
-0.47%
1M
31.78%
YTD
72.30%
6M
107.35%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
-44.24%
5Y*
-49.32%
10Y*

NEE

1D
-1.28%
1M
-11.44%
YTD
6.07%
6M
0.24%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMWL vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMWL
American Well Corporation
72.30%-32.28%-75.67%-47.35%-53.15%-76.15%9.80%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
6.07%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AMWL and NEE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.19

The correlation between AMWL and NEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AMWL:

-$5.40

NEE:

$5.27

PS Ratio

AMWL:

0.75

NEE:

4.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMWL:

$182.49M

NEE:

$27.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMWL:

$70.68M

NEE:

$13.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMWL:

-$51.93M

NEE:

$14.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMWL vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMWL
AMWL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AMWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMWL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AMWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMWL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMWL vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Well Corporation (AMWL) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMWLNEEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

0.92

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.40

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.51

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.64

4.52

-3.88

AMWL vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMWL and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMWLNEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.92

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

0.22

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.65

0.61

-1.26

Drawdowns

AMWL vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMWL drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMWL and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMWLNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.56%

-47.81%

-51.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.81%

-14.53%

-43.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.87%

-34.57%

-58.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.67%

-44.97%

-53.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.01%

-13.59%

-85.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.89%

-8.92%

-77.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.12%

4.83%

+30.29%

Volatility

AMWL vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

American Well Corporation (AMWL) has a higher volatility of 21.40% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 8.31%. This indicates that AMWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMWLNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.40%

8.31%

+13.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.51%

17.03%

+30.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.76%

23.81%

+41.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.74%

26.90%

+49.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.32%

25.48%

+52.84%

Dividends

AMWL vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

AMWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMWL
American Well Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.08%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

AMWL vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Well Corporation and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B202220232024202520260
6.70B
(AMWL) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AMWL and NEE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMWL has higher volatility (21.40%) compared to NEE (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMWL dropped -99.56% vs NEE's -47.81%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMWL and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer