PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMSF vs. PRU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMSF vs. PRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMSF achieves a -20.51% return, which is significantly lower than PRU's -8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSF has underperformed PRU with an annualized return of -0.60%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively higher 7.63% annualized return.


AMSF

1D
-2.14%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-20.51%
6M
-19.31%
1Y
-31.68%
3Y*
-10.13%
5Y*
-6.09%
10Y*
-0.60%

PRU

1D
-1.88%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-8.27%
6M
-5.49%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMSF vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-20.51%-20.78%19.62%-0.86%6.13%2.00%-6.09%24.48%-6.63%0.16%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-8.27%0.18%19.46%10.09%-3.86%45.32%-11.40%20.10%-26.46%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AMSF and PRU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005

0.40

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMSF:

$568.73M

PRU:

$35.22B

EPS

AMSF:

$2.44

PRU:

$9.85

PE Ratio

AMSF:

12.37

PRU:

10.23

PS Ratio

AMSF:

1.76

PRU:

0.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMSF:

$324.77M

PRU:

$47.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMSF:

$120.92M

PRU:

$14.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMSF:

$48.16M

PRU:

$4.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMSF vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMSF
AMSF Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
AMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PRU
PRU Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMSF vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMSFPRUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.03

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

0.08

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.82

0.18

-2.00

AMSF vs. PRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMSF Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the PRU Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMSF and PRU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMSFPRUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.22

0.08

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.13

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.24

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.20

+0.10

Drawdowns

AMSF vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMSF drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSF and PRU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMSFPRUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.35%

-88.53%

+45.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.66%

-21.46%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.35%

-25.66%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.35%

-33.11%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.35%

-65.89%

+22.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.29%

-15.90%

-26.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-18.32%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.54%

9.78%

+7.76%

Volatility

AMSF vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) is 5.08%, while Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that AMSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMSFPRUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

5.84%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.90%

17.39%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.06%

22.46%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.75%

25.80%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.01%

31.83%

-4.82%

Dividends

AMSF vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison

AMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than PRU's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
8.56%6.66%8.69%10.39%10.08%9.59%7.97%6.82%1.55%1.30%6.37%7.07%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
5.46%4.78%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%

Financials

AMSF vs. PRU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMERISAFE, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
80.09M
0
(AMSF) Total Revenue
(PRU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AMSF and PRU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRU has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to AMSF (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSF dropped -43.35% vs PRU's -88.53%.

PRU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMSF and PRU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer